Tag Archives: jisc-crig

JISC repository aggregator site

It has been announced that JISC have commissioned the creation of a new repository aggregator site:

JISC Repository Aggregator Website 

JISC funds a wide variety of development projects on behalf of its funding bodies. These projects include consultancies and supporting studies where the main deliverable is a report and projects where the deliverables include products and services as well as these reports. 

The project involves developing a small user community to guide the development of the site, to produce the site and to develop a series of bespoke widgets to draw information from readily available sources of information. 

The overall aim of this demonstrator site will be to enable a user to search for, organise and hand submit information about a range of relevant information about repositories. The repository aggregator will provide a single destination where people interested in repositories can get information about digital repositories. 

Aims and Objectives 

The objectives of the aggregator website are to: 

  • Produce a demonstrator website that can be shown to some members of the repository community to gauge whether they would find such a service useful. Then, make the service available as a public beta offering while plans are made to develop the site further. 
  • Create a customizable and personalisable solution that can adapt to the wide range of information that a user might like to aggregate. 
  • Specifically ensure the service can aggregate with RSS feeds from relevant blogs, the Intute Repository Search service, information from the RSP site including support contacts. Statistics from OpenDOAR and ROAR, Sherpa RoMEO and JULIET, brief explanations of key topics, persistent aggregated search of sources like google scholar and technorati, subject based collection details from IESR, descriptions of useful repository software, e.g. IRstats, feedforward, sword client, manakin and RSS feeds from relevant repositories. 
  • Create focus groups in a structured way to help manage the feeback from the user community at all stages of development. 
  • Specific development requirements include the consideration of the Netvides Universal Widget API, Netvibes Universe, an authentication system, cross browser compatibility. 
  • (No, not ‘widgets as found in cans of beer‘, but widgets as in ‘web widgets‘!)

    It is an interesting development and with my repository stats hat on (http://maps.repository66.org/) I’m particulaly looking forward to seeing what this aggregation can offer, and the value it will provide.game mobi

    A DRY CRIG Day

    I’ve just returned from the latest CRIG (Common Repository Interfaces Group) meeting at Bath University. In typical CRIG fashion the event was held in a bar, where the food and drink flowed freely. The CRIG team ran an excellent event are are now quite used to running useful, informative and thought proving events.

    This particular CRIG event was entitled ‘CRIG DRY Workshop’ – DRY = Don’t Repeat Yourself, and today that referred to metadata.

    The day started with 5 five minute presentations, one of which was the first public outing for our new project ‘The Deposit Plait‘. This fitted in perfectly with the aims of not repeating ourselves when it comes to depositing items into a repository, and having to typically re-enter metadata.

    There are three strands to a plait, and three strands that we hope to weave together in the deposit plait project:

    1. Work out exactly what metadata ideally needs to be provided when depositing a scholarly work into a repository. This can be done by seeing who makes use of repository metadata, and what metadata they need in order to do this effectively.
    2. Investigate what, if any, metadata can be extracted from XML documents in formats such as OOXML and ODF.
    3. See what metadata can be extracted from online or personal bibliographic systems.

    So were 1 and 2 to yield useful results, we could investigate the feasibility of writing a web service that take an uploaded document (or a reference to one), extracts some metadata (maybe title, author, abstract) and then uses these to pull in more metadata from other systems. Might be neat, might be a non-starter. That’s what the project will discover.

    Anyhow, the event was useful in a number of ways, and there were a number of nice demonstrations. I particularly liked Richard and Rob’s demonstration of depositing OAI-ORE aggregations into DSpace using SWORD. On top of that there was then the resource map encoded in RDFa in the DSpace item page allowing an RDFa reader to use a standard DSpace metadata jumpoff page as an OAI-ORE resource map. The really nice thing about it was that from the DSpace side, it only required a new packager class, and a corresponding entry in the configuration file – I was thinking it might require more tinkering. I also appreciated the ORE talk from Rob. Whilst it only lasted 5 minutes, it was enough to explain the concepts and gave me the dummy’s guide that I’ve been looking out for for some time.

    Thanks CRIG! This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , on by .