Posts Tagged ‘open access’

Follow Google’s green arrow to open content

Monday, September 15th, 2008

There is some more good news for repositories that surfaced this weekend (via Peter Suber’s blog and Klaus Graf) about how Google Scholar now highlights results that have open access versions of papers by the addition of a green flag / arrow / triangle.

Google continues its behaviour of showing the publishers version of the paper as the first result, but where it does do this, it also lists the open version next to the title:

This should make Google Scholar much more useful, as one of the common arguments held against it in the OA world is that it puts the publishers version first, even if it isn’t open but there is an open version available. Thanks Google!

As a closing remark, I’ll comment on Peter Suber’s closing remark in his blog post:

Note the first item on the return list for this search:

The green triangle points to a version of an article with a Google address.  Is Google also entering the OA archiving business?

For all we know Google may be entering the OA archiving business, but in this case it is just a PDF hosted on a http://pages.google.com/ ’Google Page Creator’ site (now ‘Google Sites’) which is a simple hosting facility provided by Google to anyone.

Google bring Scholar richness into normal search results

Wednesday, August 13th, 2008

Some good news for open access repository advocates: It seems that the normal Google search engine has now started bringing the richness of Google Scholar results into the main Google search results. This extra information includes:

  • The (first) author’s name
  • Links to papers that have cited it
  • Links to related articles
  • Links to other versions

For me this is great news. When we go out selling repositories to academics, one of our arguments is “your paper will appear in Google Scholar, and other specialist search engines such as Intute Repository Search and OAIster“. However, if we are honest, how many people use these, and I’m including Google Scholar in this, as their first point of call? Not many I suspect.

So getting this extra information into Google is a big selling point as we now get the richness of Google Scholar into our default search service.

This example shows a paper written a couple of years ago by Jon Bell and myself about using OAI-PMH and METS to move items between repositories, and you can see the extra metadata from Google Scholar being shown.

Pro mashups book with a CC license

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008

I’ve just followed a link to a blog from someones email footer, and found a book published this year: Pro Web 2.0 Mashups: Remixing Data and Web Services (Apress, 2008). The blog is by the author of the book Raymond Yee.

I was attracted to the blog and the book for two reasons:

  1. I love mashups, and when I find the time I like to tinker with my mashup - The Repository Mashup Map. I’m always looking for more ammunition to stuff in my mashups tool box.
  2. My work requires me to work extensively with Open Access Repositories. When I work with academics to examine what could be deposited in a repository we usually end up talking about books, and what can be done with them. Often, and for good and obvious reasons they do not want to archive whole copies of books. However I try to encourage them to look for options such as archiving the metadata along with a copy of the cover of the book, and maybe a sample chapter of two. The metadata can / should of course contain a link to the publishers site and somewhere where it can be purchased. All of this can serve as a good advert for the book and consequentially improve its sales. Raymond has gone to the extreme with this book, and both he and the publisher are to be commended: he has (with the publishers permission) put a copy, licensed by a ‘Creative Commons By-Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license‘ online. Great stuff!

This is a good license to use - it means anyone working on a commercial mashup would have to buy the book, and the book has to be attributed if it has been used. This could be a good move to spread the word about the book.

The book can be downloaded chapter by chapter using the following link (http://blog.mashupguide.net/toc/). The book looks excellent and covers a lot of ground. And best of all, I can dip in and out of it a bit online to see if it suits me, and if so, buy a copy.